The 2026 WNBA Draft is shaping up to be one of the most intriguing in recent memory, and here’s the kicker: there’s no clear-cut No. 1 pick. Unlike previous years where stars like Paige Bueckers (2025), Caitlin Clark (2024), and Aliyah Boston (2023) dominated the conversation, this year’s draft class is a wide-open race. But here’s where it gets even more exciting: with two new expansion teams joining the league, the draft pool is deeper than ever, and the Dallas Wings—holding the No. 1 pick for the second consecutive year—have a golden opportunity to pair another generational talent with Bueckers. But who will it be?
And this is the part most people miss: the 2026 draft isn’t just about talent; it’s about fit, potential, and the unique paths these players have taken. Let’s break down the top contenders and the controversies that could shape the future of the WNBA.
Azzi Fudd (Guard) — UConn
A sharpshooting, two-way guard, Fudd is a no-brainer for any team looking to add scoring prowess and defensive tenacity. Alongside Bueckers, she helped UConn secure the 2025 NCAA Championship, and this season, she’s leading the undefeated Huskies with 17.1 points per game in just 28.4 minutes. But here’s the controversy: While Fudd is the best guard in the draft, does Dallas really need another guard when they already have Bueckers? Or is her talent simply too good to pass up?
Lauren Betts (Center) — UCLA
Standing at 6-foot-7, Betts is a towering presence who’s been a fixture in mock drafts all season. Her size alone makes her an appealing option for Dallas, but here’s the catch: there are questions about her versatility. In a draft class filled with dynamic players, is Betts’ lack of all-around skills a dealbreaker? Or can her size and potential outweigh her limitations?
Awa Fam (Center) — Valencia
At 6-foot-4, Fam may not match Betts’ height, but she brings something equally valuable: professional experience and versatility. At just 19, Fam has already been playing professionally in Spain for Valencia, showcasing her ability to operate in the post, shoot, pass, and handle the ball—a rarity for European post players. But here’s the debate: Is her raw talent and moldability worth the No. 1 pick, or is she better suited for a team looking to develop her over time?
The Bigger Question: With these three prospects—and others—in the mix, who do you think Dallas should select? Is it the proven guard in Fudd, the towering potential of Betts, or the versatile international talent in Fam? And here’s where it gets controversial: Should the WNBA prioritize college dominance or international experience when drafting the next generation of stars?
Let’s spark some debate! Who’s your pick for the No. 1 spot, and why? Drop your thoughts in the comments below—we want to hear your take!
